Chocolate lawsuit: Hachez demands compensation for flood!
Chocolate lawsuit: Hachez demands compensation for flood!
Bremen experienced a devastating flood a year ago, which significantly impaired the city center. The Obernstraße and the market square were particularly affected, and the effects are still noticeable. Heiner Martens, the owner of the traditional Hachez chocolate business, is faced with enormous damage and has now filed a lawsuit against Wesernetz, such as the Weser-Kurier reported.Hachez, a real flagship of the Bremen chocolate culture, had to close for three and a half months due to the water damage in the summer of 2022. This closure fell exactly into the high season and brought sensitive losses with it. The renovations have now been completed and the business opened its doors again in September 2022, but the problems with the floor are still not remedied, which makes it difficult to return to normality.
lawsuit and claims for damages
The flood not only led to a dilapidated substructure and swollen wood, but also to a great financial damage that Martens has now demanded from Wesernetz. Although this has agreed to take on the legally defined obligations, the exact amount of the damage is still unclear. Martens expects a six -figure amount that is necessary for the removal of the failures and the resulting damage.
In addition, it was reported that other companies in the area such as the Martinshof City Shop and the John Benton restaurant also suffered from the consequences of flooding. The question of who arises in such cases is omnipresent and, according to an analysis of the current legal situation, becomes increasingly relevant. After all, more extreme weather events are shown in Germany that also affect other traders.insurance cover and legal situation
Insurance coverage plays an important role. The Consumer center According to elementary damage insurance is recommended in order to protect itself against nature events such as floods. However, only about 54% of households in Germany are insured against such risks, which can lead to financial burdens in unexpected events. Building insurance covers a lot of damage, but especially flood damage is often not among them, especially if there is a lack of functional backstream.
Another aspect that must be observed is the fact that the federal government has so far not introduced compulsory insurance for elementary damage, despite the demands of experts. This uncertainty leaves many homeowners in the rain. Hachez also had to find out that the company interruption insurance only partially increased for the loss costs. It is therefore crucial to check the available insurance options carefully and to put it on the right protection so as not to stay at the expense in an emergency.
The situation around the flood in Bremen and the resulting legal disputes not only poses great challenges, but also numerous other companies. While the city is trying to find long -term solutions, it remains to be seen how the legal questions will develop for responsibilities and financing.
For Martens and the other victims, it is a constant struggle to get reasonable compensation and prepare for the upcoming events. The pressure to improve insurance cover and create legal framework will continue to grow, in particular in view of the frequency of such natural events, as . A rethinking is urgently necessary to minimize future damage and protect those affected.
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Ort | Bremen, Deutschland |
| Quellen | |