Artificial intelligence in Bremen: help or obstacle in everyday life?

Artificial intelligence in Bremen: help or obstacle in everyday life?

Osterholz, Deutschland - dealing with artificial intelligence (AI) raises more and more questions that are relevant in everyday life as well as in specific contexts such as the education system or the garbage industry. A current observation shows that many people, including a reader from Ellener Feld, are affected by bureaucratic challenges. He waited for a whole nine months for the delivery of a yellow bin and thus sums up the frustration of some Bremen citizens.

The author of the article on Weser-Kurier reports on his experiences that make the influence of AI visible in everyday life. After an automated note from his car workshop about a necessary oil change, he wonders whether his well -networked car may even share information about him on social media. This raises the exciting question to what extent AI acts as a decision -making aid in everyday life or even as a more familiar.

artificial intelligence and empathy

But the author remains skeptical when it comes to using AI chatbots for the preparation for lessons at Bremen schools. He makes it clear that real intelligence has priority for him. This coincides with current studies that examine whether and how AI can promote empathy. In the Koko experiment, which Tim Althoff was carried out by Tim Althoff at the University of Washington, it turned out that people seeking help, as soon as they learned that they were supported by AI, had less trust in the offer offered. A study in "Nature Machine Intelligence" shows that while AI-based answers are perceived as empathic, the interpersonal connection remains decisive. Artificial intelligence can appear helpful, but remains emotionally empty.

The technology of artificial empathy (KE), which enables machines to recognize and react to human emotions, offers interesting approaches. These AI-based systems are based on algorithms that can decipher emotional signals, such as the facial expressions or language. Application examples include chatbots in customer service or virtual assistants in healthcare that offer emotional support. Nevertheless, the question remains open: Does sympathetic communication make sense without real feeling?

The limits of artificial empathy

A decisive difference between human and artificial empathy is that the KE can only simulate emotions without actually feeling. Topics such as trust and authenticity remain problematic. Often when using AI in sensitive areas such as mental health, there could be a feeling of emotional dependency, while the actual human connection is missing. It is therefore important to keep the expectations realistic.

• emotional depth and authenticity: human empathy is based on real feelings, Ke only simulates empathetic behavior.
• cognitive versus emotional component: human empathy includes both cognitive and emotional aspects, KE mainly focuses on cognitive.
• Trust: People must be sure that AI systems are used responsibly.

How the Weser-Kurier explains, the garbage disposal in Bremen 2026 will also become more expensive, which raises the question of whether and how AI can be used efficiently in public administration. What is certain is that trust and real human interaction remain essential, no matter how progressive the technology may become.

In a world full of technological innovations, it is up to us to find the right balance between man and machine to secure a good life.

For more information, read the articles on Weser-Kurier href = "https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/ki-empathie-kuenstliche-intelligenz-100.html" Target = "_ blank"> germany radio and xpert.digital .